I'm curious about reducing a book to a list of single keywords. As a librarian, I'm used to a controlled list of hierarchical subjects. This site is organized by random keywords supplied by the users. (That's not a judgement- I'm a big fan of randomness!) I'm going to try to boil down some happy book club choices to keywords...
Here are some happy nonfiction books:
The City of Falling Angels / John Berendt
Venice Italy Fenice opera arson characters MidnightintheGardenofGoodandEvil glassblower
Dropped Threads: What we aren't told / edited by Carol Shields
Essays women Canada young old discussion personal popular accessible
Outliers : The Story of Success / Malcolm Gladwell
Tippingpoint Blink success practice 10,000hours thoughtprovoking easyread
The Perfection of the Morning : An Apprenticeship in Nature / Sharon Butala
meditative nature lyrical Saskatchewan mixedreaction ranching spiritual nonlinear
Eat, Pray, Love / Elizabeth Gilbert
travel Italy India Indonesia Bali spiritual funny diary anecdotal easyread
I'm having a hard time describing what these books are about! How do I describe the mixed love/hate reaction of our book club to Sharon Butala's Perfection of the Morning? I like that you can include different information than the usual subjects you find in the library catalogue, like tone and read alikes. But, for my book reviews, I think I'll stick to sentences!
It makes me wonder about group think. If many people like a website, will I like it too? Do the tagging decisions of millions of people cause the best content to rise to the top? That's how I pick videos to watch on Youtube. Can I trust strangers, or might they have a business interest in what they're promoting? Sometimes word of mouth causes a book to expolode, and everyone reads it. Will digital word of mouth explode?
Delicious is a good place to keep track of your personal or work websites, but not the place to search for book reviews. At least not yet! Happy reading.